1. Another one bites the dust - BlockFi files for bankruptcy
The Facts:
- Crypto lender BlockFi filed for bankruptcy on November 28, following its decision to suspend withdrawals on November 11, after contagion spread from FTX’s bankruptcy filing that same day.
- BlockFi is owed a total of $1 billion by FTX and its trading firm Alameda Research.
- FTX’s and its over 100 affiliated companies’ bankruptcy filings included Alameda Research defaulting on a $671 million loan from BlockFi as well as frozen FTX accounts worth $335 million.
- BlockFi’s decision to file for bankruptcy was directly affected by the implosion of FTX.
- The entangledness and interdependence of BlockFi and FTX started earlier this year, when FTX provided a line of liquidity of up to $400 million to then troubled BlockFi, in return for reserved rights to acquire BlockFi, at a capped acquisition price of $240 million.
- Calculating the damage done, BlockFi issued a statement, estimating roughly 100’000 clients to be affected and claiming its assets and liabilities to be in the range of $1 - $10 billion.
- Currently BlockFi holds $256.9 million in cash and stated its plans to continue operations after a successful restructuring.
Why it’s important:
- With BlockFi being the latest domino to fall in an ever-growing list of failed crypto lenders and exchanges, the entangledness and ease of contagion within the crypto industry get underlined one more time.
- Overall bearish and weak crypto markets reinforce the chain reactions taking place, amplifying the losses amongst interrelated parties.
- BlockFi’s bankruptcy is directly linked and at large caused by the FTX crash, while on the flipside BlockFi still owes money to FTX.
- This leaves affected clients on either side, FTX and BlockFi, facing even bigger losses and impaired chances of recovering their funds.
- It was shown once more that crypto lenders and exchanges still lack proper auditing such as proof of reserves, yielding BlockFi’s “estimate” of assets and liabilities within one order of magnitude.
- The lack of proper regulation and legal requirements such as the separation of user and company funds are absent, exacerbating corporate excess and consumer harm.




